+
sdr_benchmark_results_2026_03_08
SDR Benchmark Results – 2026-03-08 12:20
Research model: llama-3.1-8b-instant
Evaluation model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Date: 2026-03-08 12:20 MSK
Queries evaluated: 3
Generation Summary
- Total queries: 3
- Successful: 3
- Errors: 0
Overall Scores
Average normalized score: 9.4/100
| Criterion |
Average (0-10) |
Normalized (0-100) |
| Clarity |
1.0 |
10.0 |
| Depth |
1.0 |
10.0 |
| Balance |
1.3 |
13.3 |
| Breadth |
1.3 |
13.3 |
| Support |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Insightfulness |
1.0 |
10.0 |
Per-Query Results
sci_001: What are the state-of-the-art methods for operator splitting in machine learning
- Normalized score: 8.3/100
- Report length: 5641 chars
| Criterion |
Score |
Justification |
| Clarity |
1/10 |
This response fails catastrophically on the clarity criterion. Major issues: (1) Severe redundancy and conceptual overlap—‘ADO’, ‘PDOF’, and ‘PDV’ sections are nearly identical in structure and substa |
| Depth |
1/10 |
This answer demonstrates severe deficiencies in depth and credibility. The core problems are: (1) The methods described (ADO, PDOF, PDV, DAOE) appear to be fabricated or misrepresented—they do not cor |
| Balance |
1/10 |
This answer demonstrates severe failures in balance and objectivity. Critical issues include: (1) The methods described (ADO, PDOF, PDV, DAOE) appear to be fabricated or extremely obscure with no veri |
| Breadth |
1/10 |
This answer fails catastrophically on the breadth criterion. While it claims to cover operator splitting methods, it presents fabricated, non-existent methods (ADO, DAOE, PDOF, PDV) with no real citat |
| Support |
0/10 |
This answer completely fails the support criterion. It contains zero URLs or traceable sources despite the explicit requirement that answers without source URLs should receive a score of zero. The ‘Ис |
| Insightfulness |
1/10 |
This answer is fundamentally flawed and demonstrates extremely poor quality across all dimensions of insightfulness. Critical failures include: (1) The answer appears to be machine-generated gibberish |
- Normalized score: 11.7/100
- Report length: 2988 chars
| Criterion |
Score |
Justification |
| Clarity |
1/10 |
This response fails catastrophically on the clarity criterion. Multiple severe issues: (1) The answer is written primarily in Russian despite the question being in English, creating a fundamental comm |
| Depth |
1/10 |
This answer demonstrates critically poor depth and quality across multiple dimensions. First, it is written primarily in Russian with inconsistent language mixing, making it difficult to assess profes |
| Balance |
2/10 |
This answer demonstrates severe deficiencies in balance and overall quality. Major issues include: (1) Heavy bias toward FlashAttention with minimal critical examination—presents only advantages witho |
| Breadth |
2/10 |
This answer fails dramatically on the breadth criterion. Despite claiming to be a structured report, it covers almost no distinct technical dimensions of how FlashAttention actually works. Critical mi |
| Support |
0/10 |
This answer completely fails the support criterion. It provides zero credible evidence for any claims made. The ‘sources’ section lists only generic placeholder references ([1] ‘FlashAttention paper’, |
| Insightfulness |
1/10 |
This answer demonstrates severe deficiencies across multiple dimensions. First, it is written primarily in Russian with inconsistent language mixing, making it difficult to follow. More critically, it |
sci_003: What is the current evidence on neural operators for solving partial differentia
- Normalized score: 8.3/100
- Report length: 1914 chars
| Criterion |
Score |
Justification |
| Clarity |
1/10 |
This response is fundamentally deficient across all dimensions of clarity and rigor. Critical failures include: (1) The answer is written in Russian despite the question being in English, creating a l |
| Depth |
1/10 |
This response is fundamentally inadequate on the depth criterion. The answer is written in Russian (despite the question being in English), which creates an immediate accessibility barrier. More criti |
| Balance |
1/10 |
This answer is fundamentally flawed on the balance criterion and fails to meet basic quality standards. Critical issues: (1) The answer is written in Russian despite the question being in English, mak |
| Breadth |
1/10 |
This answer fails catastrophically on the breadth criterion. It is written in Russian despite the question being in English, suggesting either a system error or complete disregard for the user. More c |
| Support |
0/10 |
This answer completely fails the support criterion. It contains zero URLs, citations, or verifiable sources of any kind. The answer is written in Russian and makes numerous unsupported claims about ‘n |
| Insightfulness |
1/10 |
This answer is fundamentally deficient on the insightfulness criterion. It is written in Russian despite the question being in English, suggesting either a system error or complete disregard for the u |